Skip to content

People Migration That Works

Question 5 of 6: Which solutions could tackle society's main challenges? · The whole story

💡 HappyBein recommendationWhat we recommend, and why. Open for discussion.
...
🎧 Listen to this article · 4 minA conversation between Emma and Sam, AI voices

In short: Migration will grow, pushed by climate change, conflict and the gap between young and ageing regions. Handled badly, it leads to deaths at sea, exploitation and political backlash. Handled well, it helps everyone involved. We propose four steps: more safe and legal routes, fast and fair asylum decisions shared between countries, investment in people’s chance to stay at home, and real support for integration.

Managing Regional Migration explains why people move and why this will increase. Population Change and Ageing shows why some regions will need more workers while others have many young people. This article asks: how can migration be managed so that it works for everyone involved?

  • Most migration is ordinary. About 304 million people, under 4% of the world population, live outside the country where they were born. Most moved for work, family or study, and most stay within their own region.
  • Forced displacement is rising. The UN Refugee Agency counts over 120 million people forced from their homes by war, persecution and disasters, most of them still inside their own country or in a neighbouring one.
  • Migration sends money home. Migrants send over 650 billion dollars a year to low- and middle-income countries, several times the total of all development aid.
  • Irregular routes are deadly. When there are few legal ways in, people pay smugglers and risk their lives. Thousands die each year crossing the Mediterranean alone.

1. More safe and legal routes. Match work visas to real shortages, such as in care, building and farming, agreed with the countries people come from. Include training in the home country, so that both sides gain skills. These “skills partnerships” already exist on a small scale, for example between Germany and several countries for nurses.

2. Fast, fair and shared asylum. Decide asylum claims within months, not years, with good legal help, and share responsibility between countries according to their size and wealth, rather than leaving it to the countries at the border.

3. A real chance to stay. Invest in jobs, education and climate adaptation in the regions people leave, so that migration is a choice, not a necessity. See Fair Globe Sharing.

4. Integration from day one. Language classes, recognition of foreign diplomas, the right to work quickly, and fair housing spread across regions. The sooner newcomers work and belong, the better for them and for the place that receives them.

  • “It will push down wages.” Studies generally find small effects on average wages, with some pressure in specific low-paid jobs. Strong labour rules, equal pay for equal work and enforcement against exploitation protect both local and migrant workers.
  • “It costs too much.” The cost depends on how fast people can work. Long waits and work bans make migration expensive. Quick access to jobs and training turns it into a contribution, especially in ageing countries.
  • “It threatens our culture and cohesion.” Change that is too fast and badly managed does strain communities. That is why the proposal combines more legal routes with orderly procedures and serious investment in integration, so that people can see the system working.
  • “It drains poor countries of talent.” It can, which is why partnerships include training in the home country and why money sent home and returning migrants also bring skills back.
  1. Skills partnerships for care and building with a few countries of origin, with training on both sides.
  2. A shared European target for asylum decisions within six months, with legal help for every applicant.
  3. Recognition of foreign diplomas within weeks, through a single national office.

Leaving home is rarely easy. Most people who move do so to give their family a better or safer life. And for those who receive them, fast change can feel unsettling. A good system respects both: the courage of those who come, and the need for security and fairness of those already there. See Connection and loneliness in the Personal Guide.

  • How many people should a country welcome, and who should decide?
  • How should people displaced by climate change be protected, when refugee law does not yet cover them?
  • How can responsibility be shared fairly between rich and poor countries?

There is no roadmap step for migration yet. This proposal could become one, between step 4 (“Guarantee a basic-needs budget”) and step 5 (“Cap inheritance and give everyone a fair start”), as part of giving everyone a fair start wherever they are born.

  • UN DESA, International Migrant Stock 2024
  • UNHCR, Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024 (2025)
  • World Bank, Migration and Development Brief (2024)
  • IOM, Missing Migrants Project
  • OECD, International Migration Outlook (2024)
  • Michael Clemens, on “Global Skill Partnerships”, Center for Global Development