Skip to content

What Is Society For?

Question 3 of 6: How does society turn those resources into what people need? · The whole story

📘 ExplainerFacts, how it works and the options, without taking a side.
...
🎧 Listen to this article · 4 minA conversation between Emma and Sam, AI voices

A useful starting point: a society exists to make life better for the people in it than they could make it alone.

That sounds simple. The hard questions follow straight away: better in what way, for whom, and who decides?

Whether you see society as a natural part of being human (as Aristotle did) or as an agreement people make with each other (as social-contract thinkers like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau did), societies take on tasks that no one can handle alone:

  • Security: physical safety, fair rules, and a way to settle conflicts
  • Shared infrastructure: roads, water, energy, communication
  • Cooperation at scale: trade, science, large projects
  • Care: for children, the sick, the old, and anyone who cannot fully care for themselves
  • Room to flourish: education, culture, and the freedom to build a meaningful life

Thinkers have answered “what is a good society?” in different ways. Each captures something real.

Well-being for the greatest number (utilitarianism; Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill). A good society maximises the total well-being of its members: less suffering, more satisfaction, measured across everyone.

Rights for every person (rights-based views; John Locke, modern human rights). A good society protects each individual’s life, liberty, dignity and basic needs, even when a majority would prefer otherwise.

Real freedom to live well (the capabilities approach; Amartya Sen, Martha Nussbaum). A good society gives every person the actual means, not just the formal right, to become and do what they have reason to value.

Belonging and shared values (communitarianism; Michael Sandel, Charles Taylor). A good society nurtures strong communities and a sense of belonging, because people need connection and identity, not only individual rights.

One way to bring these views together is to start from what people actually need. Physical needs come first (food, shelter, health), then security, then belonging, recognition and a sense of purpose.

Seen this way, “the best” for a society is the one that lets as many people as possible meet these needs, now and over time. That links the four views above: well-being, rights, capabilities and belonging are each a way of meeting part of them.

This is the lens the Society Guide uses. The needs themselves are described in the Personal Guide: Human needs and what drives our feelings.

“The people living in it” is where most definitions start, but the circle can be wider:

  • Future generations, who inherit today’s choices about climate, debt and resources
  • People elsewhere, affected by trade, migration and pollution across borders
  • Other living beings, whose habitats depend on how we use land and energy

How wide a society draws this circle shapes almost every decision it makes. Several the Society Guide articles, such as Fair Space Sharing, take the wider view.

The Tension Between Individual and Collective

Section titled “The Tension Between Individual and Collective”

Every society balances individual freedom against collective well-being. Too much weight on individual freedom can erode the shared foundations that make freedom possible. Too much weight on collective control can crush the personal expression that makes life meaningful.

There is no permanent answer, only an ongoing negotiation through democratic institutions, civil society and culture.

How Do We Know If a Society Is Doing Well?

Section titled “How Do We Know If a Society Is Doing Well?”

For decades, economic output (GDP) was the main yardstick. It measures activity, not well-being, so other measures have been developed:

  • Human Development Index (United Nations, since 1990): health, education and income together
  • OECD Better Life Index (since 2011): housing, jobs, community, environment, life satisfaction and more
  • World Happiness Report (since 2012): how satisfied people say they are with their lives

None is perfect, but together they show whether people’s needs are actually being met, which is the question that matters.

Understanding what society is for helps you:

  • Judge a policy on its merits, not on which side proposes it
  • Ask better questions: Who benefits? Who pays? Whose needs are left out?
  • Take part in democratic life with a clearer view
  • See how your own choices add up to collective outcomes
  • Aristotle, Politics, Book I
  • Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1651); John Locke, Second Treatise of Government (1689); Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract (1762)
  • Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789); John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)
  • Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (1999); Martha Nussbaum, Creating Capabilities (2011)
  • Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (1982); Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self (1989)
  • Abraham Maslow, “A Theory of Human Motivation” (1943), on the ordering of human needs
  • UNDP, Human Development Reports; OECD, Better Life Index; World Happiness Report